Message 10215 [Homepage] [Navigation]
Thread: oxdeT10215 Message: 1/4 L0 [In index]
[First in Thread] [Last in Thread] [Date Next] [Date Prev]
[Next in Thread] [Prev in Thread] [Next Thread] [Prev Thread]

[ox] Linus said: I won't



just read...

But why did a Finnish student succeed, where a full grown project 
such as GNU did not had success? The answer is not so obvious 
and simple: The reason was the different development model. 
Stallman and the GNU people followed the classical conception 
that a complex program like a Kernel could only be developed by a 
small sworn team, since otherwise overview and control would be 
lost. This view was intuitively placed "on the head" by Torvalds. A 
window from the Tanenbaum Torvalds debate entered history in the 
meantime clarifies that. Tanenbaum writes: »I think co-ordinating 
1000 prima donnas living all over the world will be as easy as 
herding cats... If Linus wants to keep control of the official version, 
and a group of eager beavers want to go off in a different direction, 
the same problem arises. (...) Anyone who says you can have a lot 
of widely dispersed people hack away on a complicated piece of 
code and avoid total anarchy has never managed a software 
project.« Torvalds answers: »Just so that nobody takes his guess 
for the full thruth, here's my standing on 'keeping control', in 2 
words (three?): I won't.«

aus
http://www.opentheory.org/linux-worthless/

cc


________________________________
Web-Site: http://www.oekonux.de/
Organisation: http://www.oekonux.de/projekt/
Kontakt: projekt oekonux.de



[English translation]
Thread: oxdeT10215 Message: 1/4 L0 [In index]
Message 10215 [Homepage] [Navigation]