Die hier archivierte Mail kann, muss sich aber nicht auf den Themenkomplex von Oekonux beziehen.
Insbesondere kann nicht geschlossen werden, dass die hier geäußerten Inhalte etwas mit dem Projekt Oekonux oder irgendeiner TeilnehmerIn zu tun haben.
|Thread: choxT01478 Message: 1/1 L0||[In date index]||[In thread index]|
|[First in Thread]||[Last in Thread]||[Date Next]||[Date Prev]|
|[Next in Thread]||[Prev in Thread]||[Next Thread]||[Prev Thread]|
Uli _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Hört auf zu rechnen ! (...und zu tauschen!) (...und und...)
dt. text in ox
________________________________ Web-Site: http://www.oekonux.de/ Organisation: http://www.oekonux.de/projekt/ Kontakt: projekt oekonux.de
ich hab den text mal von google translaten lassen. und ich tu den nachher ins ox-wiki einstellen und dort kann jeder die translation verbessern... Hears to count on! to exchange (... and!) (... and and...) We know today enough about capitalism, anyhow enough, in order to make us on the way to something better. There may be scientifically exciting, the zumutungen of capitalism to skandalieren again and again again analyze the fatal nature of the system ever more exactly and pursue its effects into all branchings inside. But it must be noticeable to us nevertheless, how little the people are interested in it. Although many say: "so it cannot continue!", we are hardly pulled linking to rate. That is surely not because of our theoretical weakness, but to it that we have to offer obviously no attractive solutions: neither strategies for a paradigm change, nor emancipatory models for the everyday life ("the Christians see to me does not release enough out "is the Atheist Nietz times spoettisch to have said). It is not worth at present to think too many over the "abolishment of the system". The system functions frightening reliably world-wide. Who does not believe in conspiracy, no solution for a fundamental change has. The traditional class warfare model becomes appreciably uninteresting: There is no class (more), which would be suited for the "revolution". Also a "acquiring movement" is not anywhere in view: Who is whom which to take away? And in addition: from above the system to and showed themselves then humans change the strategy into the new system inside to socialize, as historical mistake. And it would be counter productive: we do not want to oktroyieren humans new structure on and instruct them; we, children of the civil liberty, want to be funktionalisiert any longer and not funktionalisieren other. We must be able and thus only begin, where we stand for ourselves. We can make experiments, areas create for new experiences, new thinking and behavior patterns to try and these evaluate and exchange. How is much theory necessary, in order to understand capitalism? We understood enough, if we become clear over it that our thinking, acting and feeling for 400 years in an obligation and a seduction system are imprisoned, i.e. in the prison the money logic. Around 1600 this cage closed, at which humans had already built for centuries. Outgoing from Europe a new life feeling spread, but not coincidentally: In this time the everyday life life got a new inexorable basis, i.e. the final and evident dependence of all humans on the money. The new life feeling exists in the inevitable experience that from now on all something costs that the life of humans is based on the logic of constant computation, inexorably on achievement and return that social sharing must become individually "earned". This new experience entrenched itself into all depths of the human life expressions, it leaves themselves in the philosophy, which mathematics, even the music etc. to prove. And the fatal to it is so natural and completely natural that this coinage is so successful, appears that one can imagine an alternative not even more. The fact that all something costs its price has, to be worthwhile themselves, pay must that one must sort everything into the invisible coordinate system of the "value", since then became in such a manner normal that our thinking is proper blocked (see: Eske Bockelmann: in the clock of the money) however: exactly this condition of the Phantasielosigkeit and paralysis is it, at which we must set politically. Everything that could lead us out from the neoliberalen misery TINA (There is NO alternative), is the program. Each beginning, each experience, each experiment, which questions the matter of course of the money logic practically, should be welcome us to exclude any new experience from the front in here us poorer would make. We do not know the correct revolutionary way, therefore it is advisable to deal with the experiences of the others constructionally and not always again into the old error to that linking too purges itself in the "fight for the correct line" on to rub. Even if we have at present no chances to in order/switch the system off as a whole then we can do, i.e. begin something nevertheless, to off/switch the system in the head. We can of the system produced/supported social character to affect, amend, by trying to change: There are e.g. people, which reduce consciously their work time, on certain importunatenesses of our economics doing without e.g.. Television, car -, which try more unspektakulaer new living forms out (Oeko settlements, live -, households), which meetings, meeting places organize, groups of self-helps, communities of interests, initiatives etc. base). In addition there is obviously a quantity artistically - cultural initiatives of most varied kind (e.g. the evolutionaeren cells in Frankfurt, which veranstalteten recently a price writing out for "even assigned shapes of society", the office for integrative art in Nuernberg/Erfurt, which are concerned straight with the problem of shrinking cities, Otium in Bremen, an association of former development aids, the one other time feeling reflects etc..) Nearly automatic come these initiative and inside sooner or later to the border that money - /utilization logic, turn out in conflict with it and must itself so also with the problem the trespass beyond the border concern. Many, nearly all these (hopefully!) completely different beginnings and experiments will make their specific new experiences, to whose cross-linking again different could contribute, so that a ever larger treasure at components for a new world develops. It is crucial that these components begin to change our consciousness, our environment and thus the society. We try to switch the old system off step for step in the everyday life, not for moral reasons to want to prove from obligation feeling, or in order the world somewhat consciously, from the head and our clear feelings. We do what makes us freer and more content, what us acknowledgment and love of those provides, because of which is to us. We do not wait for better times, new parties, all-newest scientific results or the collapse of the system! Concerns to develop the own capacity to act (Klaus Holzkamp foundation of the psychology) to be step which lead out from the obligations and seductions of the system, clearance, cross-linkings, a new culture _ of the generosity _ - assigns to create anti-educationally and anti-politically e.g.. 1. "under its conditions" live. This apparent renouncement of a part of its that one could buy, "which one is entitled", is not Askese glorifizieren or refusal of concrete social wealth to mean, but the obligations and dependence to reduce, those by the operation of the money logic develop (procurement prostitution, debts, extorting barness, work stress). The distance between backs and wall can be increased, even if the wall stands such as concrete. 2. The social Korsett of the constant mutual computation (achievement/return, equivalent exchange) may have been historically necessary or meaningful. Anyhow it is not a law of nature and becomes objectively (in view of the increase like an explosion of the productivity) ever more unreasonable and more hinderlicher. We have the conditions to dare first steps into a human being-worthy culture of the generosity. We do not wait, until "the economy" permits us or puts close. Our economic systems lives on "scarceness": free goods cannot be sold, everything must something cost. Thus only again we can switch ourselves, in the own interest: Generosity facilitates the life, provides acknowledgment, makes attractive, strengthens for friendships, changes our environment, contributes thus by its radiant emittance to a new life feeling. 3. Emphatie develop, i.e. stop to ask, how I can use the other one for me, but respectfully includes him equally into the own life (or also not: its needyness is not more important than my own). The liberalism it sees humans as a single nature that only from self-interest with others nationalizes itself. We try the support, assistance instead of its, for discovering suggestion by the others. Like stretching and enriching the straight self-willedness can be, unserviceableness of the others for me. Naturally I pay attention also to me: who with itself is content, it can also the others well go let. 4. Needyness permit and express. Liberal the play goes in such a way that I do not talk openly about my needs and interests: That could spoil the prices for me. I am to behave I like a successful businessman, who guards and too pokern learns its professional secret. We begin with the opposite: Give up the typically male rule and superiority Attituede. in the long runness, gratitude, dependence show, everything to control and technically not solve want, own needs not over legal requirements and the obligation logic of the money to regulate. 5. Communicate . learn to define itself, requirements express uneasiness to reject, respect and tolerance learn, self value feeling develop etc.. - Behaviors, which are reserved today for the intimate range "family", friendship etc. or are rained in Crash courses to the coworker training in the interest of the company. "outside war" prevails called that times a Banker in a church conference discussion. We begin to break through this allocation of the world in business and privatsphaere and also then friendly and turned be, if it does not bring in "anything" (thus no money, no advantage). Then we can about all openly talk, also over our weaknesses, doubt, disappointments, can fatigue phases consciously notice, analyze and experiences more seriously to exchange. 6. "good handling", contacts maintain. We look for each other our distorting shank out (Handy/InterNet help thereby): we are dependent as humans on others, them make us only what we can be! Therefore we do not need to be nice to all or constantly remember, which could be times useful "relations" us. At all we could stop with forcing contacts under the question of the equivalence and computation "which have we of it?", "which bringt's?" The new communication technologies permit us the almost free selection, with whom we want to be together - independently of the large company. This new freedom of election should become us however not too "discriminatingly" leaving otherwise wird's fast boring or never which... the good (interesting) pages the/that others to be found out is excitingly. 7. Resources connect: In order to moderate the current "terror of the economics" (Vivien Forrester) to reduce the not yet avoidable dependence from the dominant economics to humans could their resources interlace and mutually usable make, e.g. with the hotel idea: Humans with much place load nomadisch living persons in to do time long their resources together: the NomadIn has an accommodation, which house owner supported with the preservation of its house: for all took part a "profit": More interesting life, new impulses, alive cross- linking by the Nomaden. To parts quality can be tried out in such a way as new life. Under this aspect also exchange rings, the MC shops etc. would have an important supporting function 8. The adventure, new one into the foreground place and not the trouble. Are not blind themselves about the fact that the beginning is arduous and genuine pioneer achievements required. Is good, cheat yourself to invent, if from grind the computation logic announces itself again: E.g. rather asks itself, what I could learn with a difficult contact, with a arduous new experience, instead of asking whether it was worthwhile itself for me computationally. Always remember: Rebellion makes also fun and strengthens the self-confident its. 9. Take if possible few achievements up of the civil institutions. The more one on it lets oneself in colors these the stronger off. There is, as we knows, no "neutral" instances, but functions of the existing system, which support, secure and arrange it even active. E.G. would be too superior to avoid the "course of law" in principle. One could solve, through draw lots interest conflicts differently e.g. spielerisch, a reconciliation celebration o.ae. (example: Two software entrepreneurs decided recently a law case by an official poor lifting. Both determined thereby: "... many time and high costs saved!"). 10. Support leg play leg: Itself clearly over the fact its that the separation from the money logic is very difficult, because it does not concern thereby a conceited, ideological problem, but our world definitely and fundamentally by the money is determined. Provisionally nobody might be able to leave the money logic completely. The door can be only partial, i.e. on the "Standbein" level: Where the zumutungen of the system cannot be avoided, one should not these displace or legitimize or talk beautifully, but analyze exactly, reconstruct their effect on the own life and other humans as relentlessly as possible and then with clear consciousness and internal distance the own borders actively set: As far I feel forced to go through where I set which border. Small hero acts are also much. 11 Do not missionieren and nobody instruct, but with itself and the other one better to deal try - perhaps this new quality of life radiates out... What is "political" to it? 1. For the future organization of a better society we need such individuals. If the laehmende Alternativlosigkeit and the unaesthetic Populismus of the Neoliberalismus become uninteresting for humans, we need all the fantasy, independence and generosity, which we today already experimentally to learn and to exchange be able. It was the deadly error of material existing socialism to suppress this creativity of humans systematically instead of promoting and set on it it. If humans behind their system would have confessed, also economic problems could have not completely spoiled the project. 2. Otherwise only waiting for the change remains... We do not know, where the main switch of the system is to be found whether there are at all one and who could approach to this switch. But the system is about already to abolish itself. From the two most elementary functions the system logic comes into contradictions: Work and money. The present crisis does not express itself as lack concrete wealth all companies and shops pours over from being it could loosely the multiple quantity discharge. Also "workers" draengeln itself enormously in the queue. The many unemployed persons are obviously not used for the production of the concrete wealth. And on the other side jammern all producers over purchasing power lacking, thus the absence of money at (potential) the consumers. As attractively our system can remain, if it creates neither sufficient money nor "jobs". While the VWL waits desperately for the next Kondradieff wave, we can switch already today: not the system (s.o.) but our consciousness: we can us for the system of the future train, can mentally for a new logic prepare. Us the old system should become indifferent. We develop our own standards and life conceptions. If the old mechanism still duempelt some time before itself, if we thereby unueberzeugt still another while going through the better: A better world can come never automatically. We need rather as much as possible well prepared and experienced individuals... 3. There are nevertheless already two new and rather successful social developments, which could point into the correct direction: The free software movement and the "all inclusive idea". Range proves the free software movement in the High Tech that a outstanding product freely and not when commodity can be manufactured. Freiwillige, from whom task even posed inspired humans in the whole world are involved in it. They "do not work" for money, but from material interest to get over acknowledgment or because fun makes it for them. Each consumer cannot use these free goods freely, it is the producers anything guilty it did it for itself. It acts thereby thus neither over "exchanges", nor over "give". There are no obligations, contra-accounts, requirements etc.. It is also no combat model or any demand on possibly someone: somewhat new comes into the world and nobody must something be taken away. And like it, if one can use everything freely to have to possibly furnish without about prices worries or a return can one feels today at the all inclusive vacation, at the free Buffet or, where there is already a Flatrate (lump sum), try out: In this free spaces (for which one must pay today unfortunately still entrance) goes it only around concrete needs, around which actual question, which is good and meaningful for me, which provides allowance and finds acknowledgment of others for me, like I my social place etc. - the formal criterion of profitability, the constant computation falls simply away... So it is to become! ________________________________________________________ _____________ ___________ _____________________________________ Uli franc (ulifrank online.de) homepage: ulifrank.info _______________________ Web-Site: http://www.oekonux.de/ Organization: http://www.oekonux.de/projekt/ Contact: projekt oekonux.de
|Thread: choxT01478 Message: 1/1 L0||[In date index]||[In thread index]|